Language · Word of the week

Word of the week: homophone

Homophones: words which sound the same but are spelt differently, like “their” and “there”, and indeed “they’re”. They formed part of my 9-year-old daughter’s homework again at the weekend and we have been discussing them on the way to school. Most commonly there are pairs of homophones, like “pail” and “pale” – the former was… Continue reading Word of the week: homophone

Language · Word of the week

Word of the week: concerning

This is a post concerning the word “concerning”. It means “about”, or “regarding”. When I last checked it did not mean “troubling”, “worrying”, or “of concern”, but increasingly that is how people use it. I find this development mildly troubling. Words change meaning. I’m fine with that. People change, technology develops, new words come along,… Continue reading Word of the week: concerning

Language

Mong. Spastic. Flid. And why I will never watch “Love, Actually”

Mong. Spastic. Flid. When I was at school, in the 1970s, these were all insults used by other children, not by me or my friends. I don’t remember any of us using these words. Just typing them, nearly 40 years later, makes me feel uncomfortable. I thought that they had gone away in the 1980s,… Continue reading Mong. Spastic. Flid. And why I will never watch “Love, Actually”

At the movies · Language · Word of the week

Word of the week: conflicted

“Conflicted” was really my Word of the Year for 2012, the year that “The Iron Lady” was released in the UK. It features Meryl Streep’s Oscar-wining performance as Margaret Thatcher. I am a fan of Meryl Streep but was resolutely not a fan of Margaret Thatcher. I had to see the movie, like every other… Continue reading Word of the week: conflicted